Rashida Tlaib: Voted NO on HR 9340: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended

Want more votes like this?

Open the feed or see every vote by Rashida Tlaib.

Records

Rashida Tlaib, Sep 16, 2026

Vote verified. Official roll call data

Linked facts are computed by software from public filings and can be wrong. Report an error if you see one.

3 facts · all sourced

Money
$22,000 from people who work at Microsoft, Google and 1 more data center company in the year before this vote. That is 1.4% of the itemized contributions reported to the FEC in the 2025-26 cycle.
Public record shown beside the vote. It does not show why anyone voted.
9 contributions, Sep 27, 2025 – Oct 5, 2025. Filed through Jul 15, 2026.
Big Tech employees count only in executive, policy or infrastructure roles, or at $1,000+.
As of Sep 16, 2026Source: docquery.fec.gov(opens in a new tab)
Party line
Voted differently from most Democrats: 206 of 209 voted YES.
As of Sep 16, 2026Source: clerk.house.gov(opens in a new tab)
Lobbying
Lobbying disclosure filings by MICROSOFT CORPORATION (2026 Q2, via TIBER CREEK GROUP) list HR 9340 as an issue. Filings do not say which officials were contacted.
As of Jun 30, 2026Source: lda.gov(opens in a new tab)

The bill

Ratepayer Protection Act

Topic: Energy

Read the full summary

The bill requires state utility regulators and nonregulated utilities to consider implementing a standard to hold certain large-load customers responsible for the costs associated with any generation, transmission, or distribution upgrade of electric service necessary to serve such customers. A large-load customer means a non-residential electric consumer that enters, or requests to enter, an agreement concerning the sale of electric energy primarily to operate information technology infrastructure and related systems pertaining to data storage and computational applications and services (e.g., data centers) that have a peak electric demand of 100 megawatts or more at a single site or campus. Specifically, the bill requires states to consider implementing a federal standard for large-load customers. The standard must require rates charged by electric utilities for providing electric service to a large-load customer to be designed to recover from the large-load customer the full, incremental cost of any generation, transmission, or distribution upgrade necessary to serve such customer.

Source: Congressional Research Service summary

Bill on congress.gov(opens in a new tab)

Vote source: clerk.house.gov

Every member's vote

These are public records placed side by side. They do not show why anyone voted. How we get this data

Voted NO on Fast-track passage of the “Ratepayer Protection Act” (HR 9340)

Want more votes like this?

Report an error

Add context

Keyboard keys

Records

The bill

Voted NO on Fast-track passage of the “Ratepayer Protection Act” (HR 9340)

Want more votes like this?

Report an error

Add context

Keyboard keys

Records

The bill

Rep. Tlaib voted NO on fast-track passage of the “Ratepayer Protection Act” (HR 9340)

Voted NO on Fast-track passage of the “Ratepayer Protection Act” (HR 9340)

Want more votes like this?

Records

The bill

Rep. Tlaib voted NO on fast-track passage of the “Ratepayer Protection Act” (HR 9340)

Voted NO on Fast-track passage of the “Ratepayer Protection Act” (HR 9340)

Want more votes like this?

Records

The bill